Yes, indeed, we won BIG on November 2nd.
There were victories all over the country. But here, in the People's Republic of Massachusetts most conservative candidates were defeated. This really surprised me because nearly everyone I talked to was going to "throw the liberals out".
I have some friends who are life-long liberal Democrats but this time voted for conservatives.
But something happened at the polls all over Mass which had never happened before... something very fishy...
On November 2nd I listened to local talk radio in the morning and callers began reporting about "poll watchers" at every precinct.
In our state you first go to the check-in person and give your street name and number, and then your name and they put a check-mark next to your name and give you a ballot. After you vote you go to the check-out table and give your street, number and name and they check you off. Then you feed your ballot into the machine.
The "poll watchers" were seated behind the check-in tables and were each equipped with a printed list of all registered voters, listed by street. That is the voter list used by the check-in/check-out people.
All of the so-called poll watchers used their copies of the lists of voters and they checked off the names of the voters as the voter checked in.
You may not think this is anything unusual, but it has never happened in the nearly 40 years I have been voting.
Also, I had been a poll-watcher a long time ago during an election in Boston. My instructions were to just observe. That is how it is usually done.
Who authorized giving lists of all registered voters to these people? And when did these extra lists get printed? Did they have more copies in case Republican poll watchers showed up? What if the Independents and the Greens all wanted to have chairs placed behind each check-in table? Are five different parties going to be accommodated with lists and chairs?
Okay, so I continued to listen to talk radio throughout the day and when the Boston-based program came on, more callers were reporting about the mysterious new poll-watching technique. If the host had not blown this off, perhaps someone would have taken a closer look.
The polls close at 8pm here. I waited until 7:10 to go vote. There is only one voting place in my town for all 4 precincts and it is a wide open area where you can see everyone in the room from any spot in the room. There were only 2 other voters there while I voted and I did not see the poll-watchers.
I stopped to greet a friend who was a check-in person from another precinct. I asked her if there had been poll-watchers there with voter lists. She said yes, but they all left at exactly 7:00pm. I asked if she knew if they were Dems or Republicans and she said they were all Dems. She said not one Republican poll watcher had been there.
And, frankly there are never any poll watchers in our town, of either party.
Now comes the REALLY FISHY part:
The next day I ran into a guy who lives in my town and he said he was so glad to see such a high voter turn-out. He said he went to vote at 7:45 and the place was packed!!
Okay so at 7:10-7:15 there was a trickle of voters and all of a sudden herds of people rush down to the polls to vote at the last minute. Yeah, sure.
Strange thing was that when I got to the polling place, the parking lot was very full so I was totally surprised at how empty the voting room was. Where were all the people who had driven the cars there? Is it possible that those people were in another part of the building, busy memorizing the name and address of a voter who was NOT checked off on the lists? Is it possible that they know that very few people vote between 7 and 8 pm?
There is no identification required to vote in this state. So all you need is the name and address of a registered voter who is not already checked off the list.
I hate to sound paranoid, but it appears there was a very organized effort at voter fraud which paid off. I mean this strange new poll-watching method was happening all over the state!!
Why would a poll watcher need a list of voters. They claimed they were going to use the unchecked names to call people, but there are no phone numbers listed. And why did they all leave at 7:00? Why not call people at 5:00 or 6:00?
If they were really just poll watchers, they would stay until the police escort the ballot boxes out of the room when the voting ends.
I made no formal complaint about any of this because the Secretary of State, who is the person who would investigate voter fraud, is a Dem who has held the office for 40 years.
The other person to which one might complain is the attorney general. That would be Martha Coakley. The woman defeated by Scott Brown. The woman who said "Technically it is not illegal to be illegal in Massachusetts." That is an exact quote!
I saw no point in lodging a complaint.
I think it would be far more fruitful to alert the rest of the country to organize to prevent this from going national. All it would take is one person in each precinct.
Bottom line is IF THE REPUBLICANS DON'T STOP THIS OBVIOUS FRAUD AND IF THEY DON'T ORGANIZE EVERY SINGLE PRECINCT IN THE COUNTRY WE ARE GOING TO BE HURTING IN 2012.
Do you realize that the evil-doers like to fly their trial balloons in Massachusetts?
Massachusetts elected a black man from Chicago to our highest office (Governor Duval Patrick) before the evil-doers offered up that other Black man from Chicago as candidate for president (Barack Obama). And "coincidentally" they are good friends who went to college together.
Mass passed the local universal health care, a smaller scale version of the national health care bill.
Mass tried to put a provisional martial law bill in place, but the citizens made too much noise. Had it passed here, it would have gone national.
This voter fraud thing went off perfectly, so it will go national. I guarantee it!
Yes, on November 2nd we won a victory nationally, but the war has just begun. We have just 2 short years to preempt this. Conservatives need to make an organized effort to man the polls with at least one person per precinct to be a poll watcher. This needs to happen all over the country.
And it wouldn't hurt to push for new laws requiring ID to vote.
Please pass this info on.
God bless.
There were victories all over the country. But here, in the People's Republic of Massachusetts most conservative candidates were defeated. This really surprised me because nearly everyone I talked to was going to "throw the liberals out".
I have some friends who are life-long liberal Democrats but this time voted for conservatives.
But something happened at the polls all over Mass which had never happened before... something very fishy...
On November 2nd I listened to local talk radio in the morning and callers began reporting about "poll watchers" at every precinct.
In our state you first go to the check-in person and give your street name and number, and then your name and they put a check-mark next to your name and give you a ballot. After you vote you go to the check-out table and give your street, number and name and they check you off. Then you feed your ballot into the machine.
The "poll watchers" were seated behind the check-in tables and were each equipped with a printed list of all registered voters, listed by street. That is the voter list used by the check-in/check-out people.
All of the so-called poll watchers used their copies of the lists of voters and they checked off the names of the voters as the voter checked in.
You may not think this is anything unusual, but it has never happened in the nearly 40 years I have been voting.
Also, I had been a poll-watcher a long time ago during an election in Boston. My instructions were to just observe. That is how it is usually done.
Who authorized giving lists of all registered voters to these people? And when did these extra lists get printed? Did they have more copies in case Republican poll watchers showed up? What if the Independents and the Greens all wanted to have chairs placed behind each check-in table? Are five different parties going to be accommodated with lists and chairs?
Okay, so I continued to listen to talk radio throughout the day and when the Boston-based program came on, more callers were reporting about the mysterious new poll-watching technique. If the host had not blown this off, perhaps someone would have taken a closer look.
The polls close at 8pm here. I waited until 7:10 to go vote. There is only one voting place in my town for all 4 precincts and it is a wide open area where you can see everyone in the room from any spot in the room. There were only 2 other voters there while I voted and I did not see the poll-watchers.
I stopped to greet a friend who was a check-in person from another precinct. I asked her if there had been poll-watchers there with voter lists. She said yes, but they all left at exactly 7:00pm. I asked if she knew if they were Dems or Republicans and she said they were all Dems. She said not one Republican poll watcher had been there.
And, frankly there are never any poll watchers in our town, of either party.
Now comes the REALLY FISHY part:
The next day I ran into a guy who lives in my town and he said he was so glad to see such a high voter turn-out. He said he went to vote at 7:45 and the place was packed!!
Okay so at 7:10-7:15 there was a trickle of voters and all of a sudden herds of people rush down to the polls to vote at the last minute. Yeah, sure.
Strange thing was that when I got to the polling place, the parking lot was very full so I was totally surprised at how empty the voting room was. Where were all the people who had driven the cars there? Is it possible that those people were in another part of the building, busy memorizing the name and address of a voter who was NOT checked off on the lists? Is it possible that they know that very few people vote between 7 and 8 pm?
There is no identification required to vote in this state. So all you need is the name and address of a registered voter who is not already checked off the list.
I hate to sound paranoid, but it appears there was a very organized effort at voter fraud which paid off. I mean this strange new poll-watching method was happening all over the state!!
Why would a poll watcher need a list of voters. They claimed they were going to use the unchecked names to call people, but there are no phone numbers listed. And why did they all leave at 7:00? Why not call people at 5:00 or 6:00?
If they were really just poll watchers, they would stay until the police escort the ballot boxes out of the room when the voting ends.
I made no formal complaint about any of this because the Secretary of State, who is the person who would investigate voter fraud, is a Dem who has held the office for 40 years.
The other person to which one might complain is the attorney general. That would be Martha Coakley. The woman defeated by Scott Brown. The woman who said "Technically it is not illegal to be illegal in Massachusetts." That is an exact quote!
I saw no point in lodging a complaint.
I think it would be far more fruitful to alert the rest of the country to organize to prevent this from going national. All it would take is one person in each precinct.
Bottom line is IF THE REPUBLICANS DON'T STOP THIS OBVIOUS FRAUD AND IF THEY DON'T ORGANIZE EVERY SINGLE PRECINCT IN THE COUNTRY WE ARE GOING TO BE HURTING IN 2012.
Do you realize that the evil-doers like to fly their trial balloons in Massachusetts?
Massachusetts elected a black man from Chicago to our highest office (Governor Duval Patrick) before the evil-doers offered up that other Black man from Chicago as candidate for president (Barack Obama). And "coincidentally" they are good friends who went to college together.
Mass passed the local universal health care, a smaller scale version of the national health care bill.
Mass tried to put a provisional martial law bill in place, but the citizens made too much noise. Had it passed here, it would have gone national.
This voter fraud thing went off perfectly, so it will go national. I guarantee it!
Yes, on November 2nd we won a victory nationally, but the war has just begun. We have just 2 short years to preempt this. Conservatives need to make an organized effort to man the polls with at least one person per precinct to be a poll watcher. This needs to happen all over the country.
And it wouldn't hurt to push for new laws requiring ID to vote.
Please pass this info on.
God bless.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know what you think... even if you hated it!!!