Octuplets- the more the merrier

I listen to people talk about the woman who had the eight babies, bringing the total of her offspring to 14.
Every single person was critical of her.
They complained that she isn't married... that her house is too small... that she lives with her parents... that she already has 6 kids under seven years old... that she must be mentally unstable... that she should have reduced the quantity before going ahead with the pregnancy...
Everyone complained...
I, as usual, do not agree with the majority opinion.
First of all, I don't think it is my business to decide how many children are too many for someone else's family.
That aside, I wonder: When did the American mindset shift to the position that big families are a negative?
It appears the liberal brainwashing which has been going on for decades has paid off. It is no longer a thing to be admired when one has many children. The Chinese and Margaret Sanger would be proud.
In China, to try to get a handle on the population, families are allowed to have only one child. It is illegal to have more than one. Culturally it is more desirable to have a male baby, so if the parents find out they are about to have a girl, they abort her. Then they try again, for a boy.
Sometimes the girl babies are killed at birth.
If a family already has a child and the woman becomes pregnant again, she is required by law to have an abortion, and it is enforced if she doesn't do it voluntarily.
I mentioned Margaret Sanger. She was the founder of Planned Parenthood and a promoter of Eugenics...


Definition of Eugenics
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3335
Eugenics: Literally, meaning normal genes, eugenics aims to improve the genetic constitution of the human species by selective breeding. The use of Albert Einstein's sperm to conceive a child (by artificial insemination) would represent an attempt at positive eugenics. The Nazis notoriously engaged in negative eugenics by genocide.
The word "eugenics" was coined by Sir Francis Galton (1822-1911) to denote scientific endeavors to increase the proportion of persons with better than average genetic endowment through selective mating of marriage partners.
The practice of eugenics was first legally mandated in the United States in the state of Indiana, resulting in the forcible sterilization, incarceration, and occasionally euthanasia of the mentally or physically handicapped, the mentally ill, and ethnic minorities (particularly people of mixed racial heritage), and the adopting out of their children to non-disabled, Caucasian parents. Similar programs spread widely in the early part of the twentieth century, and still exist in some parts of the world. It is important to note that no experiment in eugenics has ever been shown to result in measurable improvements in human health. In fact, in the best known attempt at positive eugenics, the Nazi "Lebensborn" program, there was a higher-than- normal level of birth defects among the resulting offspring.

That is a quote from a medical website. The link is above.
Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood to weed out the "undesirables" in the population. Undesirables being poor people, minorities, handicapped people, less intelligent people... people that were determined by the eugenics group to be less qualified to live than they themselves. In other words, the eugenics group would take the place of God, in whom most of them did not believe.
Planned Parenthood... nice innocuous name, eh?
The eugenics group, which was a formal organization, evolved directly into Planned Parenthood (PP).
One of the main goals of this group was to rid this great nation of the "blight" of Blacks. The Black race was no longer useful because they could not be slaves and they were far too often mating with whites and spoiling the white race. So they started opening PP clinics in black neighborhoods in urban areas. And they started paying Black preachers to lecture their flocks on the woes of birthing children into poverty.
Did you know that a great majority of abortions are performed on blacks, even though their population is in the minority? Google it.

In every state where Blacks make up at least 10% of the population, the abortion rate for them is 2 to 3 times greater than the population percentage.
Examples:
Alabama-blacks are 26% of population and 54% of the abortions in that state are performed on blacks.
North Carolina- 21% pop.--44% abortions
Georgia- 30% pop. -- 57% abortions
Tennessee- 17% pop. -- 41% abortions
And the most astonishing figure:
Mississippi- 37% population-- 77% abortions!!
Margaret Sanger's work is really paying off in Mississippi.

How does all of this relate to the woman who had the octuplets?
Simple: If she was rich and married, no one would criticize her for wanting to keep all of her babies alive. There has been a cultural shift in this country, due in large part to the brainwashing by PP types, that poor people should not have babies. That simply makes no sense, unless you are rich. But poor people and "middle class" people are saying the same thing: "Poor people should not have babies."
Somehow the eugenics people, probably through use of the media and the schools, have convinced almost the entire nation that you must have a lot of money to have a lot of children.
The fairly new institution of welfare has justified this mandate in the minds of most. "They are having babies that we are going to be paying for." That may be the sole purpose for instituting welfare in the first place: to give the masses the idea that it will cost them if poor people multiply, thereby justifying the demand that poor people kill their babies.
The octuplets have revealed, to the extreme, the feelings which have been fostered by eugenics group.

Oh, by the way, check this out:
http://www.blackgenocide.org/
This is a very interesting site. It states that the most dangerous place for a black baby is in the mother's womb.

But it is not just Black babies who are targets of Planned Parenthood.
PP would like to wipe out all "undesirables," even though the Nazi program to do that resulted in "inferior" quality humans, as stated in the article from the medical website.
You end up with hybrids, and hybrids are fine until you try to get offspring from them. The offspring, if they are even able to reproduce, have many more physical and mental problems than the population at large.
I would like to ask the eugenics people who they plan on having for laborers if they rid the country of poor people? Are you going to then put some of the middle class into forced labor so there will be someone to wait on you at the restaurant or someone to pick up your garbage? Maybe those jobs can be done as community service on a temporary basis. Can you just see forcing some spoiled yuppie to fill potholes in the road... although these days, that is probably a very high-paying job.... or will they come pump your septic tank? ...or will they stock the shelves at the supermarket?
I digress, but don't I always? : )

Anyway, my discomfort with the objections about the octuplet mom arises from my conviction that God should decide who is going to have or not have a baby and that this society has shifted toward believing that they can set the criteria for future mothers. Sure it would be nice if the woman was married and if she was rich. But those are merely circumstances and circumstances can change. What cannot be undone is the selective killing of embryos.
The mother of the octuplets was asked to reduce their numbers and she refused to have any of the tiny embryos killed. I would not have been able to do it either. From a religious perspective, if they were not to be born, they wouldn't have been.
But they were born and poor Margaret Sanger is probably turning over in her grave!